EEE on SFP links: what do you believe would be better?

So, after a long trial-and-error, and becoming a true nightmare for netdev developers, I finally got my SFP+ module with AQR113C working on my BPI-R4. Now that I have the link UP, the next step is: how do I make it waste less power? During the night, I assume most of the time only broadcast packets are being sent at home. Whereas annoying for any device which wants to sleep, there’s no way out (I guess).

ethtool sfp-lan
Settings for sfp-lan:
        Supported ports: [  ]
        Supported link modes:   100baseT/Full
                                1000baseT/Full
                                10000baseT/Full
                                1000baseKX/Full
                                10000baseKX4/Full
                                10000baseKR/Full
                                2500baseT/Full
                                5000baseT/Full
        Supported pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
        Supports auto-negotiation: Yes
        Supported FEC modes: Not reported
        Advertised link modes:  10000baseT/Full
                                10000baseKX4/Full
                                10000baseKR/Full
        Advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
        Advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
        Advertised FEC modes: Not reported
        Link partner advertised link modes:  100baseT/Half 100baseT/Full
                                             1000baseT/Half 1000baseT/Full
                                             10000baseT/Full
                                             2500baseT/Full
                                             5000baseT/Full
        Link partner advertised pause frame use: Symmetric Receive-only
        Link partner advertised auto-negotiation: Yes
        Link partner advertised FEC modes: Not reported
        Speed: 10000Mb/s
        Duplex: Full
        Auto-negotiation: on
        Port: Twisted Pair
        PHYAD: 17
        Transceiver: external
        MDI-X: Unknown
        Current message level: 0x000000ff (255)
                               drv probe link timer ifdown ifup rx_err tx_err
        Link detected: yes
root@APBureau4:~# ethtool --show-eee sfp-lan
EEE settings for sfp-lan:
        EEE status: enabled - active
        Tx LPI: 0 (us)
        Supported EEE link modes:  1000baseT/Full
                                   10000baseT/Full
                                   1000baseKX/Full
                                   10000baseKX4/Full
                                   10000baseKR/Full
                                   2500baseT/Full
                                   5000baseT/Full
        Advertised EEE link modes:  1000baseT/Full
                                    10000baseT/Full
                                    1000baseKX/Full
                                    10000baseKX4/Full
                                    10000baseKR/Full
                                    2500baseT/Full
                                    5000baseT/Full
        Link partner advertised EEE link modes:  100baseT/Full
                                                 1000baseT/Full
                                                 10000baseT/Full

there’s a lot of info up there, but basically the question is:

What would result in the greatest power savings? running at 100baseT/full without EEE or 1000baseT/full with EEE?

I tested both modes, they are both stable. One could say “EEE stops the clock and turns off unneeded phy components, so it would be better”, but “slowing down everything as a whole without clocking down” may work as well.

So, what do you guys think?