I think those two additional antennas are for the LTE/5G module.
1 Like
I was excited for the R4 until I learned the production wifi card would be the paired down 6-antenna version.
I was going to use 2.4/5Ghz diplexers on the 14 antenna version to get down to 10 antennas, and it seemed like the ideal upgrade from my current BPI-R3. With the 6 antenna version is almost seems like a downgrade.
At any rate, I think offering both cards to let consumers choose would be the best option. It seems like most of the work has already done for both cards.
I personally will not buy the BPI-R4 if it only offers the cut down wifi card, and I’ll just wait for a wifi 7 access point that does offer 4x4 or 4t5r.
1 Like
I also agree with some of the other users here. I was looking forward to the 4T5R on the 6 GHz band with the 14 antenna version of the Wifi 7 module since I think it’s a unique setup but also providing strong value and is worth the DIY effort even from those who don’t usually DIY Wifi with OpenWRT.
Personally, I was looking forward to purchasing the BPI-R4 (with and only with the 14/10 antenna version) to test out and play around with 4T5R, but also 4x4/4x5 on 5 GHz/6 GHz I think would be a unique selling point and worth the DIY work to put in.
3x3 only for 5 GHz and 6 GHz? I’m not sure it’s worth it for me to invest in this ecosystem with only that option… And I don’t think I’m alone based on the polling numbers here…
This could’ve been one of the best Wifi 7 AP setups that you could have for insane value most likely if that 14 or 10-antenna version was available…
I’m going to continue to hold off until we hear something about either a 14 or 10-antenna version for the Wifi 7 Module.
1 Like
Hi Frank,
Thank you for your poll. Because our case is relatively small and 14-ntenna are too difficult to handle, we changed it to a 6-antenna solution.
Since more people prefer the 14-antenna version, I will seriously consider whether to make a 10-antenna version, and maybe with ePA, but this puts forward higher requirements for heat dissipation. After finishing the OpenWRT one and problems such as heat dissipation/casing are resolved, I will think about it
What does ePA mean? It was hard to Google, since a lot of the results I got were about the USA’s Environmental Protection Agency. With some advanced search, the most relevant sounding thing I found was “elliptical patch antenna.” Is that what you were talking about? If so, what does it mean?
ePA=External PA.
Many MTK chips have buildin PA/LNA inside, that’s iPA, but the power is not very high,
we can get higher power with an external PA.
Ok, so ePA = external power amplifier. Thanks.
How about a new case design? Something like this
1 Like
Is this an issue that needs to be resolved in-house first? I’m sure since the community would prefer the full setup, someone in the community could design a 3D-printable case and/or figure out appropriate heatsinks (or even simple active cooling) so long as the module itself is available on the market. So even if you don’t want to make an official chassis I’m sure someone would design one if you released a 14 or 10 antenna module 
A 10 antenna version with ePA/eLNA would be great.
if there is such big case for the 10/14-antenna version, why not put a 140mm fan @5v under it? should be absolutely silent and more than enough to get rid of the heat.
Please make the 10 Antenna version, i really want the 14 one but I’m happy to compromise. If i had of known a 6 was all that was being considered I’m not sure i would have brought an R4
1 Like
As far as I understand, the 10 antenna version is not a compromise, they will just add onboard diplexers to join 2.4 and 5 under same antennas
6 antennas solution with iPA limits the performance of the r4, heat dissipation or other problems i believe many diyers can figure out how to deal with them as this is a developer board. Beside many already expected adding more heat dissipation solution because sfp+ module is quite hot and also the 7988. Many of diyers expect better performance rather than exquisite look.
hi eelt,
We need to consider a preliminary draft solution first. If we don’t have an official solution, we should make it easier for the experts in the community to solve it themselves in the future, rather than thinking that it is impossible to do it because our design is too bad.
BTW, we are on vacation for the Chinese New Year and will seriously consider this when we return.
2 Likes
Hi Halry，
Thank you for your suggestion, we will seriously consider it 
6 antenna version is 12v too (sw4 on)?
I voted for the version with 14 antennas.
I want to exploit the possibilities of each WiFi frequency band to the maximum. But I understand that designing a box with 14 antennas is not the easiest, so I am willing to accept a version with only 10 antennas.
In this case, I want to know the references of real antennas optimized for dual frequency…
14 all the way - why would I want something cr*ppier than the routers I can get for $10 off eBay?
I also want 14 or 10 antennas version. Why should I buy such a router and don’t use it with maximum performance?