We added several extra steps to ensure the EEPROM was written correctly:
including rereading the actual written EEPROM and comparing it with the target value, reading the power configuration in software after installing each BE14 onto R4, and adding a hardware power meter to test the actual output power.
I fully understand your point!
I didn’t buy the board. I might accept 7200 Mbps, but I wanted 5000 Mbps or 3200 Mbps (because of power consumption). So I’m not financially involved.
The problem is though they’ve admitted that there’s an issue with the board, it’s not the speed that’s affected rather the range, due to a design flaw they didn’t consider in which was constantly denied till recently, while I wasnt expecting a fully polished software but I was expecting a board that would work to basic standards and expectations, I could understand minor hardware bugs but this is not minor at all
It very much is a design flaw, as they didn’t even isolate the power amplifiers, whether it was intentional or not is a completely different, everyone isolates the power amplifier but they didn’t, if it weren’t a design flaw why go back and make a new BE14 then?
I can understand software issue that’s not the problem here, the problem was cost cutting, it’s clear the attempted to cut costs and corners and nobody would know, but range is affected significantly
Not really looking for money back, just swap our cards for the newer fixed ones, and for them to recover their money they can sell our old cards off to the industry which found the WiFi cards good for their usage
@simon@sinovoip is that not possible? I’m sure it’s not hard todo
I am having issues with the BE14 module having excessively high noise values. This is significantly affecting the range. If the new board revision mitigates the noise issue, can I get my current BE14 module replaced? I purchased the module under the understanding that it would be functional.