Mali-450 support by lima

Afair 5.4 is latest kernel i added lima changes…it needs a modified mesa library. And we have only the power on/off via code…no dts only version.

Hdmi console needs no lima…it works also without lima…framebuffer config options (+hdmi driver of course)

Thats correct. Just in case - full kernel oftion is CONFIG_DRM_MEDIATEK_HDMI

@LeXa2, just wondering, is there an EFI implementation for bpi-r2? If so where can i learn about it?

Afaik @ray created efi environment with uboot

1 Like

Yes and no. U-boot has the bare minimum support for EFI boot and open bootloader specification but some changes are required to work properly on R2. I had implemented these changes and use all my R2s with EFI grub2 instead of u-boot to boot operating systems. I hadn’t pushed my changes yet to my github u-boot repo though as hadn’t seen much interest for this from other people. If you’re interested in it I can try to clean up the code and push it in near future.

1 Like

I’ve applied dts patch to 5.8-main and got success:

Following research showed that it’s likely the proper way to use lima:

examples:

and many others mali boards - please search for “mali-supply” in dts files.

So IMHO overlay is not nesessery, and we should ude dts regulator.

@frank-w, i’ve created the pull-request for your 5.8-main branch, please check it out.

5.9-branch WIP - i’ll commit it as soon as it’s done.

P.S. it’s likely applicable for 5.5 (tested in my 5.5 branch), 5.6, and 5.7, but not tested.

5.4 changes is up to you, current patches works great.

If there is no more power consumption we can leave it enabled

If i remember correctly - you have an AC power meter? I don’t have it :frowning:

Ok, i compare with and without regulator if i find some time :slight_smile: just squash the 2 commits add commit message (and update subject to follow mainline convensions “arm: dts: Add lima related…”) and add your signed-off (btw. You’ve committed as root) so that we can post to mainline later

Do you mean rebase? Ok

Ok, can you provide some link(s) to example(s)? :slight_smile:

git log arch/arm/boot/dts/mt7623n-bananapi-bpi-r2.dts

Or any other dts :slight_smile: or my hdmi series: https://patchwork.kernel.org/project/linux-mediatek/list/?series=335017

If you git is setup right (and using as user) signed off can be added by

git commit --amend -s

author can be set with --author="…"

1 Like

Ok, i have some lack of experience :slight_smile: :

git push
Username for 'https://github.com': d3adme4t
Password for 'https://[email protected]':
To https://github.com/d3adme4t/BPI-R2.git
 ! [rejected]                  5.8-main -> 5.8-main (non-fast-forward)
error: failed to push some refs to 'https://github.com/d3adme4t/BPI-R2.git'
hint: Updates were rejected because the tip of your current branch is behind
hint: its remote counterpart. Integrate the remote changes (e.g.
hint: 'git pull ...') before pushing again.
hint: See the 'Note about fast-forwards' in 'git push --help' for details.

after rebasing.

UPD: done with --force, but looks like i messed up with authors

TODO: fix author.

Do you need the kernel precompiled? :slight_smile:

No i can compile myself…need 2 versions with/without change and it’s easier if i do it bacause after build i upload to tftp :slight_smile:

Author is still root…and please add commit message and signed-off

Sure, right afte i figure it out. (Tommorow it’s 00:37 my local time :slight_smile: )

Ok, thx :slight_smile:

As it is your top-most commit amend is enough (if not rebase is needed for edit-mode)

First add your signed off and add commit-message (describing what you do with commit) below the subject,above signed-off (leave one blank line between message and signed off).

git commit --amend -s

Copy name+email from signed off and use it to set author as it is same format

git commit --amend --author="name <email>"

You need force push again because commit-hash has changed

this is how it should look (example):

running 5.8-main from tftp (no modules) without the patch is 4.4w after stabilization…with regulator it is same…so with dts-node alone there is no more power-consumption, maybe with lima module loaded, but thats also with the other patch from 5.4.

so if lima works now in 5.9 i can send patch to mainline (need to build mesa again…)

For building mesa: Is there anything different to instructions i posted to my wiki https://wiki.fw-web.de/doku.php?id=en:bpi-r2:hdmi#lima ?

@DeadMeat have you seen lima issue again on 5.8? [BPI-R2] Kernel Development

Crosscompile seems to be possible https://sunxi.org/Mali_Open_Source_Driver#Cross_Compiling if that does not work,we can add a chroot like i do for building hostapd

build_hostapd.sh (753 Bytes) buildchroot.sh (1,2 KB) But how to catch the files installed to pack them in tar.gz/deb? Maybe with destdir :smiley:

this is patchfile and build-script…last line have to be changed anyhow to install into other directory for packing mesabuild.sh (662 Bytes) mesa.patch (1017 Bytes) for travis/script-build we need to install depencies first

sudo apt-get build-dep mesa # after enabling source-packages

in 5.9-hdmi i see lima is initialized…

root@bpi-r2:~# dmesg | grep lima                                                
[   10.479118] lima 13040000.gpu: gp - mali450 version major 0 minor 0          
[   10.492463] lima 13040000.gpu: pp0 - mali450 version major 0 minor 0         
[   10.505431] lima 13040000.gpu: pp1 - mali450 version major 0 minor 0         
[   10.518215] lima 13040000.gpu: pp2 - mali450 version major 0 minor 0         
[   10.530953] lima 13040000.gpu: pp3 - mali450 version major 0 minor 0         
[   10.543583] lima 13040000.gpu: l2 cache 8K, 4-way, 64byte cache line, 128bits
[   10.558019] lima 13040000.gpu: l2 cache 128K, 4-way, 64byte cache line, 128bs
[   10.573732] lima 13040000.gpu: bus rate = 500500000                          
[   10.584858] lima 13040000.gpu: mod rate = 500500000                          
[   10.597993] [drm] Initialized lima 1.1.0 20191231 for 13040000.gpu on minor 1
root@bpi-r2:~# 

xserver seems to use the mesa-driver i compiled for 5.4…

[    27.438] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card1)                   
[    27.440] (II) xfree86: Adding drm device (/dev/dri/card0)                   
[    27.460] (II) no primary bus or device found                                
[    27.460]    falling back to /sys/devices/platform/13040000.gpu/drm/card1    
e loaded elsewhere.                                                             
[    27.460] (II) "glx" will be loaded by default.                              
[    27.460] (II) LoadModule: "glx"                                             
[    27.465] (II) Loading /usr/lib/xorg/modules/extensions/libglx.so            
[    27.569] (II) Module glx: vendor="X.Org Foundation"                         
[    27.570]    compiled for 1.20.4, module version = 1.0.0                     
[    27.570]    ABI class: X.Org Server Extension, version 10.0
1 Like

Some power measurments:

Google Photos

I remembered that my usb power-metes supports voltage up to 24V so i measured the routers power comsupltion:

  1. 5.4 kernel, idle, with lima support, and lima module removed:

Google Photos ~4.67W

  1. same kernel idle with lima loaded:

Google Photos ~4.7W

  1. same kernel,Xorg,DE, and glxgears running:

Google Photos ~5.48

  1. same, but extreme tux racer instead of glxgears:

Google Photos ~5.77W

  1. same, DE and xorg are shutted down after previous tests:

Google Photos ~4.75W

So in my measurements max difference between idle and not initialized lima is about 0.1W

P.S. In all tests i’ve usef @frank-w’s latest debian image with it’s kernel and if i remember correctly it enables lima power only on lima init, so removed module prevents GPU from power-on.

P.S. I’ll try to perform same tests with 5.8-main with and without dts-regulators in a coupleof days.

I can test it.

It’s generally the same, but in master branch which i use, you’ll need to replace -Dgallium-drivers=kmsro,lima to -Dgallium-drivers=kmsro,lima,swrast in order to satisfy vulkan dependency, or to explicitly disable vulkan support. It also required meson version > 0.5x which should be installed from sid in debian.

P.S. as for me in git master there are some issues fixed: at-least with blinking buttons/menus in DE, and it’s more stable.

No, after i’ve updated from rc to 5.8-main, but i didn’t used 88x2bu wifi anymore.

I see you already did it :slight_smile:

Which version should we use without the meson depency from unstable? Does it also requre gallium change?

Sorry, didn’t get it, which version of what?

All steps are the same as described before, the only chage is meson version: the latest in debian 10 is 0.49.2, and the minimal required is 0.5x (i dont remember exactly) and the sid’s version is 0.55.1-1. It (0.55) likely shold be moved to buster-backports in some time but idk any dates.

No other changes

P.S. If you meant which version of mesa that is not affected by debian’s meson version - i dont know. We should try latest stable 20.0.x. current git is 20.2.

P.S.S if i got it right - https://gitlab.freedesktop.org/mesa/mesa/-/pipelines/159793

20.0.8 builds with meson v 0.49.2

FIX: current git is 2.3.0 so 2.2.x is probably already released

1 Like